The film part of RYM (e.g. forum + film pages) can be useful if you're into more generally arthouse films. The discussion isn't at the same level of this site, but I find it a step above letterboxd.

Letterbox, as boreads mentions, is the closest match. It's a lot larger so there obviously isn't such a strong sense of community, but it does work as a social mid–highbrow film reviews site. IIRC, "Letterboxd for books" was mentioned by yarb as a potential lit.salon slogan a few months back.

tokyodrifter

27 days ago

I think "Letterboxd for books" is basically Goodreads. It's more review and logging-focused, while this site is much more a discussion-centric forum.

0Reply

maybe limf can start a film.salon section for the site 🤔

I'm not that into movies, so forgive me if this isn't high-quality or whatever, as I wouldn't know, but have you checked out r/TrueLit? Obviously reddit is completely different than this site, but I thought the discussion I've seen on there is pretty good.

Unfortunately not. I'm way more of a cinephile than a bibliophile so that'd be my dream. It hurts being the one weirdo who puts effort into their reviews instead of doing unfunny ne-liners or having weird tankie meltdowns! I really like this site and I wouldn't mind if this expanded to include films/albums as well. Not tryna be selfish but

boreads

28 days ago

Why are you gatekeeping letterboxd?

0Reply

demiurgelovato

27 days ago

because I'm a nerd who like to overanalyze things tbh also gatekeeping is sick or else we wouldn't be here

1Reply

tokyodrifter

27 days ago

Letterboxd should be kept behind a gate, in a prison cell.

1Reply