Picked this book from a discount bin at a bookshop. I seem to stumble onto Buddhism a lot lately, and I thought a biography of Siddhartha would be a nice refresher at the moment. Having read the discourses before, I was interested in seeing whether Blomfield could provide a nice bridge between the discourses and the historical person behind them.
Blomfield's writing has a realistic tone, and before coming to the more mythical portions of Siddhartha's life, the book reads like a history book. He describes the political and economic landscape, gives a sense of the religious ferment of the time, and touches on Siddhartha's family life before he began his journey towards enlightenment. I enjoyed this part of the book, particularly because it made Siddhartha feel more like a historical person rather than simply the protagonist of a religious biography.
At first I was quite excited reading this book, as Blomfield's modern style and seemingly objective approach made it easy to read, at least compared with the discourses, which are quite convoluted and full of repetition. This initial excitement quickly died down. It felt as though Blomfield had a checklist of story points that he had to hit in the book, and as a result he would rush through meaningful portions of Siddhartha's life. Multiple times I had the urge to pick up the discourses as Blomfield glanced over a portion of the story I fondly remembered. The discourse with Saccaka and the Deer Park Sermon, for example, are discussed in only briefly rather than being explored in any meaningful way. At times it felt as though Blomfield either did not understand the teachings or simply did not consider them important enough to dwell on. I cannot really tell which, and I don't want to attribute an attitude to the author that may not be there. By the end I was disappointed by how much had merely been skimmed over. Of course, the book is only about 300 pages, so there is a limit to how much detail a biography of this scope can contain. Perhaps this is less a failure of execution than a mismatch between what the book is trying to do and what I expected from it.
