(I'm writing about books that were significant to me in some way because it seems a worthy project -- review, not a review, whatever)
It’s very strange to me that Joanie D. has been so en vogue the past few years. Sure there’s a renewed interest in explicitly feminine writing, and Didion does have the sort of harridan chic that a lot of publishers love to put on display, but at the same time, to shoehorn her into contemporary women’s writing, or women’s writing in general, would be a disservice to her. She would have probably called such things condescending and infantilizing. Especially given how bitter she is in towards the feminism of her day. Her politics, such as they were, leaned right, but above all else, she was apolitical. She’s unsparing here towards Ronald Reagan, for instance, but that mostly seemed to be because of his tasteless imitation of taste (sidenote, her examination of the Getty Center later on in the text celebrates that institution’s tasteful imitation of tastelessness). Meaning that many of the same writers and critics who lionize her today would have called her a reactionary were her opinions still current.
