If this is Pynchon's last novel — and despite his near-nonagenarianism I haven't given up hope of seeing those purported Civil War and French Revolution researches cohere — then it's about as well-turned a capstone as you could wish for. His last three books have been explicitly detective stories, the ones before only implicitly so. All his books are mysteries, folks running up against the cranium-crunching complexity of the universe and failing in different ways to unravel it. Pynchon's detectives — and his readers — have all the clues, but no solution, 'cause there is none, just stories that require more or less suspension of disbelief. We're all in the dark. I think is him spelling it out, in his genial, joking way: "we're in for some dark ages, kid. Dim, at least" as prototypical Pynchon Brit spy Nigel Trevelyan tells our hero, Hicks.Hick's job as a gumshoe — delineated in the gumshoe's manual he keeps figuratively pulling out of his ass pocket, never to much effect — is to find the path, the cookie crumbs signing the way out of the epistemic swamp. But this story is about the path not taken. Realities branch too fecundly for your Heisenbergs and even your coolest, most uncertain cats to keep track of, let alone an uncomplicated ex-strikebreaker like Hicks McTaggart. One minute he's about to kill a man, next minute his beavertail is "asported", in paranormal lingo, away to some other dimension, only to reappear or "apport" when the bolshie is gone. (These concepts of asport and apport get abbreviated to "ass and app" in what is for sure an old man comment on modern life.) But remnants of unrealized futures or pasts, might-have-beens, afterimages, are the emblem of Pynchon's philosophy of the hypothetical. What could, or might, have happened is important, real even; nothing's inevitable. And events that don't eventuate leave echoes behind them, and/or it's a case of people falling victim to narrative — as Skeet says,

Have had this open for days, since I realized I posted my review almost immediately after it. Finally had the time to give it the attention it deserves and I’m thrilled that I did. This is such a great analysis of everything Pynchon. I love the realization that every character has always been a drifter. Michael S. Judge says, with respect to Pynchon: “History is the cutting room floor.” I think this review highlights that brilliantly