Politigram & the Post-left documents the emergence ca. 2016-2018 of niche online communities that coalesced around anarcho-primitivist, Stirnerite, anti-civ, and eco-nihilist ideologies. This is (somewhat regrettably) salient for me as around the same era I was browsing ideologically adjacent parts of Twitter and reading some of the associated theorists.
First, the good: I think that this kind of internet ethnography is valuable, and Citarella is (or was) one of the only people doing it in an accessible way (it's cool that you can read this online for free). Seeing these memes and discord conversations compiled in one place demystifies them and exposes the degree to which online fringe politics is often just a role-playing/brand-building exercise. Moreover, the semi-chronological organization helps trace the 'media ecology' in which these communities propagated and competed.
The book's thesis is that obscure and poorly-documented online networks are displacing legacy media's role in shaping political identities, and as the Overton window of the latter has contracted that of the former has widened in bizarre directions. Online politics are inherently obscure and have to be traced via diligent analysis of social networks. It's not a mind-blowing insight but it's illuminating to see it documented this way. Compiling these posts must have required tons of legwork in brain-melting group chats and discord servers.
With that said, Citarella is an unimpressive writer. Politigram can't find a sweet spot between being a quasi-academic research article and a chatty blog post. There are enough typos to be annoying and on more than one occasion he ends a sentence with 'lmao'. Since I read it for free on Substack it was fine but the fact that he's selling physical copies of this is embarrassing.

josh citerella has a book?!? damn learn something new everyday on lit salon