I'm not accusing anyone of stealing mental illness valour with this, though I do think it's a mark against the work that 99% of reactions land somewhere along the 'I'm in this photo, and I don't like it' lines. A lot of Austin's evocations of hyper-neurotic death obsession are pat, obvious to the point of stereotype. Anxiety is portrayed as a bucephalus bouncing ball; Gilda's internal state creeping through endless offshooting directions that all inevitably circle back towards her core obsessions. The prose is jittery and brittle, as is our narrator. The problem is not accuracy; we don't write fiction to identify literal facts but spiritual truths. All of it, its wider plotting and sentence-to-sentence construction, its always-shrinking confrontation-avoidant protagonist, it rings as hollow to me as a 'how to tell if you are...' TikTok because it is the most accessible, understandable, and surface-level representation of itself. Neurotic thoughts are not containable nor consistent; that this book is received as so proper to the experience of the average online everyperson tells me that it fails to plunge deeper than the first-thought representations of anxiety that everyone else has already identified.
