Jun 3, 2025 4:31 AM
Modern poets have a kind of literary autism. Your sped has a script for social interactions, your hack has a script for what he is pleased to call "poems". One script may be about obeying and the other about disobeying, but the revolting effect is the same. Your sped reads that autists struggle to make eye contact and ends up staring at his interlocutors like a cobra. Your hack reads about poetic license and breaks every rule of good prose all at once.
So it is with Sexton. There is no punctuation, all the similes are non sequiturs, and every other verb is a metaphor. Simile and metaphor fight for room as they arrive together, together sink into the same oblivion. There is nothing of poetry here. Not a note of music, not a nudge of rhythm. There is not a single phrase in this book that writes itself on the memory, not a single image that anyone would think to return to.
1 Comments
6 months ago
It was not the most helpful thing to turn poetry into a science. Once we start dissecting and naming the parts of good literature, we give the vivisectionists the idea that if they want to be good, all they must do is reverse the process, and go from the parts to a whole. For example, how is this not a good poem?: https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poetrymagazine/poems/149257/the-burdens; see, it has a volta here, some repetition there, a hidden meaning behind it, and sprinkled with little turns of phrase on top. Isn't that all that Homer did and more? Give him his laurels already!