The problems with this novel begin with the first paragraph: "Let's start with the end of the world, why don't we? Get it over with and move on to more interesting things."
This paragraph is problematic for two reasons. The first is that the end of the world is more interesting than anything else this novel has to offer. That's not necessarily a strike against the novel itself β many stories use the world's end as a jumping-off point for any number of related topics β but this paragraph sets one hell of a high bar for the story, and one it is ultimately unable to overcome. As a narrative device, apocalypses unleash social upheaval on a grand, inconceivable scale. Here, that social upheaval is mostly ignored in favor of a bog-standard trauma narrative that reveals little about its central characters, substituting pain for personality. Yes, it's very easy to tell that this was published in 2015.

A crap and inexplicably popular novel. Nice review.