The Hugo Award for best novel is wrongfully considered by many to be one of the premier science fiction awards for the written word in speculative fiction. The prizes, awarded by the World Science Fiction Society at the annual Worldcon, are voted on by all the members an attendees. It’s essentially a popularity contest. By the 2000s it was regularly awarded to Fantasy novels as well, which is fair enough because the distinction can at times be muddy.
Presaging Gamergate, 2013 saw the rise of a movement called the “Sad Puppies,” a campaign launched by people frustrated by what they saw as a trend towards giving the Hugo award to literary works and socially progressive themes. The campaigns aimed to create voting blocks for their works of choice: mostly right wing, military science fiction.
It was a bit ridiculous. Awarding works of literary merit over popular schlock is not a bad thing. And Science Fiction can be at its best and most poignant when it explores how sociological matters change with new technologies. Le Guin’s does this excellently with gender and sex. Delany’s does it with polycules, making them essential for ship navigation. Over the following years, progressive minded attendees backlashed against this campaign, and voted for their preferred works. ’s reception and awards can’t really be removed from this context. has identity politics and representation in spades; it’s an intersectionality themed bingo card. Conceptually, however, Jemisin’s novel does little with it.

This book SUCKED, I absolutely hated reading it.