Whoever wrote the introduction to my edition remarked that Malthus is one of those few authors to become widely verbed. It's not usually good for an author when they become so-verbed. "Kafkaesque" is misused, "Platonic" is an insult, and "Malthusian" usually designates a very doom and gloom view of population. I don't think Malthus was particularly enthused about the ramifications of his theory, and those who confuse what an author argues is the case, with what the author hopes the case is, are not treating him too fairly. The argument is essentially this: Population increases (from empirical data of the late 18th century, and theoretical modelling) geometrically (exponentially). Food increases (from more such data) arithmetically. Geometric sequences always outpace arithmetic ones, so there will always be pressure from want of food in society. He spends the first few chapters outlining this, and then the rest of the book criticizing various opponents, especially Godwin and Condorcet, for failing to recognize impossibilities in their presumptions.
Recent reviews
Recent lists
Recent writings
✦
✦
✦
